Governance
Validator voting habits and participation rate across every proposal.
Illustrative demo data · generated in the browser, not live chain data
Regularly voting validators
32
≥ 75% participation · of 52 active
Average participation rate
76.1%
Active set
Rarely voting validators
1
≤ 25% participation
Nakamoto coefficient
5
Validators needed to reach ⅓ of voting power
Active validator voting habits
Share of each vote type for the 20 largest active validators.
Centralization of voting power
Kurtosis of validator delegations over time — lower is healthier. Sampled every 25,000 blocks.
Total votes cast by type
Every vote from every validator, all proposals.
64
Proposals
- Yes51.1%
- No10.1%
- Abstain12.4%
- Veto2.1%
- Missed24.4%
Turnout by proposal
Share of eligible validators that voted, last 24 proposals.
Fun facts
- Most likely to vote
- Natron · 100%
- Most likely to abstain
- Fathom Five · 75%
- Least likely to abstain
- Ridgeline Labs · 0%
- # of non-voting active validators
- 0
Voting statistics table
Aggregate statistics of vote type and participation rate per validator.
| Obsidian Stake | 1.8M | Active | 98.4% | 7.9% | 48 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Quartzline | 1.4M | Active | 55.2% | 28.1% | 14 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 26 |
| Vantage Ridge | 1.1M | Active | 40.5% | 0.0% | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 22 |
| Falconet | 914.7K | Active | 62.0% | 0.0% | 27 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 19 |
| Northwind | 901.8K | Active | 71.7% | 41.9% | 18 | 5 | 18 | 2 | 4 | 17 |
| Brightwater | 857.3K | Active | 90.7% | 12.2% | 35 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 5 |
| Nimbus Nine | 648K | Active | 41.9% | 23.1% | 7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 33 | 18 |
| Lapis Labs | 618.1K | Active | 96.7% | 0.0% | 27 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 1 |
| Silverleaf | 616.1K | Active | 36.2% | 23.8% | 14 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 37 |
| Mosaic Staking | 528.9K | Active | 43.8% | 7.1% | 23 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 36 |
1–10 of 58
1 / 6