Governance
Validator voting habits and participation rate across every proposal.
Illustrative demo data · generated in the browser, not live chain data
Regularly voting validators
24
≥ 75% participation · of 41 active
Average participation rate
74.7%
Active set
Rarely voting validators
1
≤ 25% participation
Nakamoto coefficient
3
Validators needed to reach ⅓ of voting power
Active validator voting habits
Share of each vote type for the 20 largest active validators.
Centralization of voting power
Kurtosis of validator delegations over time — lower is healthier. Sampled every 25,000 blocks.
Total votes cast by type
Every vote from every validator, all proposals.
52
Proposals
- Yes53.3%
- No10.2%
- Abstain9.4%
- Veto1.8%
- Missed25.4%
Turnout by proposal
Share of eligible validators that voted, last 24 proposals.
Fun facts
- Most likely to vote
- Falconet · 100%
- Most likely to abstain
- Senet Staking · 68.4%
- Least likely to abstain
- Basalt Works · 0%
- # of non-voting active validators
- 0
Voting statistics table
Aggregate statistics of vote type and participation rate per validator.
| Saffron Stake | 5.5M | Active | 33.3% | 28.6% | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 31 | 14 |
| Papyrus Labs | 1.7M | Active | 36.4% | 0.0% | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 21 |
| Keystone Arc | 1.7M | Jailed | 71.2% | 5.4% | 30 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 15 |
| Marigold | 1.4M | Active | 46.2% | 4.2% | 21 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 28 |
| Equinox | 1.4M | Active | 80.0% | 0.0% | 22 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 7 |
| Solstice Node | 947.1K | Active | 63.5% | 15.2% | 24 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 19 |
| Hieratic | 864.1K | Active | 71.2% | 51.4% | 15 | 2 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 15 |
| Silverleaf | 779.5K | Active | 96.7% | 6.9% | 20 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 1 |
| Falconet | 695.1K | Active | 100.0% | 52.6% | 8 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 33 | 0 |
| Umber | 692.5K | Active | 96.2% | 4.0% | 21 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 1 |
1–10 of 50
1 / 5