Governance
Validator voting habits and participation rate across every proposal.
Illustrative demo data · generated in the browser, not live chain data
Regularly voting validators
32
≥ 75% participation · of 56 active
Average participation rate
72.8%
Active set
Rarely voting validators
1
≤ 25% participation
Nakamoto coefficient
4
Validators needed to reach ⅓ of voting power
Active validator voting habits
Share of each vote type for the 20 largest active validators.
Centralization of voting power
Kurtosis of validator delegations over time — lower is healthier. Sampled every 25,000 blocks.
Total votes cast by type
Every vote from every validator, all proposals.
96
Proposals
- Yes46.9%
- No10.8%
- Abstain12.8%
- Veto1.6%
- Missed27.9%
Turnout by proposal
Share of eligible validators that voted, last 24 proposals.
Fun facts
- Most likely to vote
- Ember Validator · 100%
- Most likely to abstain
- Umber · 62.5%
- Least likely to abstain
- Ibis Works · 0%
- # of non-voting active validators
- 0
Voting statistics table
Aggregate statistics of vote type and participation rate per validator.
| Ember Validator | 2.9M | Active | 100.0% | 10.4% | 69 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Kestrel Infra | 2.3M | Inactive | 95.9% | 54.3% | 26 | 6 | 38 | 0 | 23 | 3 |
| Nightjar | 2.2M | Active | 28.1% | 29.6% | 18 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 69 |
| Hathor Nodes | 1.9M | Active | 98.9% | 6.5% | 71 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Ridgeline Labs | 1.4M | Active | 97.9% | 1.1% | 73 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Obsidian Stake | 1.2M | Active | 66.7% | 6.9% | 36 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 29 |
| Scarab Stake | 945.6K | Active | 91.5% | 0.0% | 44 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 37 | 5 |
| Verdigris | 797.1K | Active | 100.0% | 1.2% | 61 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 0 |
| Wolfram | 778.3K | Active | 98.6% | 61.6% | 22 | 5 | 45 | 1 | 22 | 1 |
| Carnelian | 621.2K | Active | 100.0% | 2.0% | 40 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 45 | 0 |
1–10 of 72
1 / 8